Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Morasse

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 21, 2006PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSosman, J.

The defendant, after pleading guilty and being sentenced to State prison, appeals from the denial of his motion to correct the mittimus, contending that he was not given proper credit for days spent “in confinement prior to such sentence awaiting and during trial.” G. L. c. 279, § 33A. Prior to his change of plea and sentencing, the defendant had been released on bail, subject to pretrial probation conditions, including the requirement that he remain confined to his home and monitored by way of an electronic bracelet. The defendant argues that such “house arrest” qualifies as a form of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Zone Book, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. State v. SpeaksWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Purcell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Chalifoux v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Harris v. CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. Samuel S., a juvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  4. Commonwealth v. DonohueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. MaddenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API