Securities Investment Co. v. Bennett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
An action for malicious use of civil process is an action for injury to the person, rather than one for injury to the reputation, and therefore is not barred under Code Ann. § 3-1004 until two years after the cause of action accrues. McCullough v. Atlantic Refining Co., 50 Ga. App. 237, 238 (177 SE 601); Davison-Paxon Co. v. Norton, 69 Ga. App. 77, 80 (24 SE2d 723). The cause of action does not accrue, and the statute does not begin to run, until the action on which the process issued has been finally terminated in favor of the defendant. See Printup Bros. & Co. v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mullins v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Gordon v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- McCullough v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Davison-Paxon Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Printup Bros. & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Isidore Shulman, M.D. v. Dona L. Miskell, Philip F. Hudock, EsquireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Walker v. McLartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Walker v. McLartyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991