Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Atlantic Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 10, 1934No. 24230PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

It is difficult to determine from the plaintiff’s petition the particular form of action on which he relies. Ilis petition contains some of the elements essential to an action for damages because of a malicious abuse of legal process, of a malicious use of civil process, of malicious prosecution of a possessory warrant as a criminal proceeding, of false imprisonment and of false arrest. The defendant demurred to the petition, upon the grounds: (1) that no cause of action was stated; (3) because it appeared from the allegations thereof that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Lowe v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Hazlehurst v. Savannah, Grippin & North Alabama RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  4. Stoddard v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Hutcherson v. DurdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dale v. City Plumbing & Heating Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Simons v. EdouardeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Daniel v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. Davison-Paxon Co. v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Godfrey v. Home Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API