Legal Opinion

Graber v. MAD BREWER, INC.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 24, 2011No. 3:09 CV 299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

JAMES T. MOODY, District Judge.

Defendant Mad Brewer, Inc. (“Mad Brewer”) has moved for summary judgment (Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J., DE # 19; Def.’s Br. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ. J., DE # 20), plaintiff Corry L. Graber (“Graber”) has filed a response in opposition (Pl.’s Resp. in Opp’n. to Summ. J., DE # 23), and Mad Brewer has filed a reply. (Def.’s Reply to Pl.’s Resp. in Opp’n to Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J. 1, 5, DE #24.) For the reasons explained below, the motion will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

First, the court must resolve the parties’ argument concerning what facts this court…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas Hovermale v. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
  2. Gomez v. RihaniDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API