Legal Opinion

People v. Armour

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1923No. 14807PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

An information was filed in the municipal court of Chicago charging plaintiff in error, Armour, with the offense of pandering. He pleaded not guilty and in writing waived a trial by jury and was tried in the municipal court before a judge, found guilty and judgment was entered accordingly. The cause was taken by writ of error to the Appellate Court for the First District, where the judgment of the municipal court was affirmed, and it has been brought to this court by writ of error for further review.

The record shows that the information was signed and sworn to by Julia Cunningham, a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibler v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Luken v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. People v. ZurekIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Richman Chemical Co. v. LowenthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  2. The People v. CroweIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  3. The People v. RifeIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. The People v. SpiesIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. The People v. BoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API