Legal Opinion

C.D. Hayes, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 30, 2006No. 01-376 CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

Before the court is Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, which seeks dismissal of the remaining five causes of action in the Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).1 The court finds that plaintiff provided the contracting officer adequate notice of claims for wrongful termination and equitable adjustment, and that as a result, it possesses jurisdiction to consider the merits of the second through sixth causes of action. However, because the court already has determined…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keeter Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Bowles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API