Legal Opinion

Cervantes v. MacO Gas Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1960No. Civ. 9642PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

Plaintiffs, Hermila Cervantes and Paul Cervantes, husband and wife, commenced an action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of their adult son, Alex Cervantes, who died as a result of monoxide poisoning. The jury brought in a verdict in favor of the wife, Hermila, but adverse to the husband, Paul. Defendant, Maco Gas Company, made a motion for a new trial which was granted on the ground that the court had committed error in instructing the jury that any contributory negligence of Paul was not to be imputed to Hermila and in refusing to instruct the jury that any contributory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bartolozzi v. MallegniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Johnson v. Western Air Express Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Scott v. NevisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Benwell v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Syah v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Morales v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Cherrigan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API