Legal Opinion
Morales v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1979No. Civ. 5008PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRETZ, J.*—
Statement of the Case
Petitioner James Morales seeks a writ of mandate commanding respondent court to vacate its order compelling him to answer interrogatories. The interrogatories were propounded by real party Teresi Trucking, Inc., one of several defendants in a wrongful death action brought by petitioner and his three minor children to recover damages resulting from the death of Phyllis Morales, petitioner’s late wife. For the reasons to be explained, we have concluded that the interrogatories must be further limited, but that as so limited, they must be answered by…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Board of Trustees v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Vinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Dompeling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Christ v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.