Legal Opinion

State v. Ruthkowski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 1930No. 27,925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Upon an information charging defendant with obtaining $690 from Albert Johnson by false pretenses there was a conviction. A motion for a new trial was denied, judgment was entered, and defendant appeals from-the order and judgment.

The facts of which there is no dispute are as follows: Albert Johnson, a cattle buyer, on or about July 26, 1928, visited the farm defendant, on May 11, 1927, had leased to his son Stanley. In a conversation Avith defendant, Johnson ascertained that 23 head of cattle on the farm were for sale. The price of $690 was agreed upon, the cattle were delivered Avithin a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marceau v. Travelers' Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. State v. WeilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. Nelson v. RuthkowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Oleson v. NewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. BarkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. State v. SnyderOhio Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API