Breckenridge Cannel Coal Co. v. Scott
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SCOTT. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Scott County.— Hugh G. Kyle, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
This is an action of ejectment, brought to recover four tracts of land — the first tract, four hundred and eighty-two acres; the second, eighty acres; the third, one hundred acres; and the fourth, three hundred acres.
The tract of eighty acres is not now in controversy; likewise so much of the four hundred and eighty-two acres and the three hundred acres as lies outside of the Joseph G-. Norton grant, under which the defendants claim.
It is conceded hy the complainants that as to so much of the land in controversy as lies within the Joseph G. Norton grant, No. 22402, based on entry, No. 2315,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Byrd v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Yancy v. YancyTennessee Supreme Court · 1871
- Bon Air Coal, etc., Co. v. ParksTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Tennessee Coal Co. v. McDowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- John Smith Others v. the Lessee of CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 1814
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southern Coal & Iron Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Southern Iron & Coal Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Dunlap v. SawvelTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- McEwen v. Thomas Coal & Land Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Sequatchie & South Pittsburg Coal & Iron Co. v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.