Legal Opinion

Sequatchie & South Pittsburg Coal & Iron Co. v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railway Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

PROM GRUNDY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of G-rnndy County. —Y. C. Allen, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The bill was filed in the chancery court of Grundy county to recover three tracts of land, 642 acres, 142 acres, and 190 acres, all lying inside defendant’s Mc-Ewen grant No. 7892, the first two tracts within complainant’s Samuel B. Barrell grant No. 5099, the last lying partly within the grant last mentioned, and partly within complainant’s Samuel B. Barrell grant No. 5090. The Barrell grants are the oldest, hut the McEwen grant purports to be based on an entry in the name of Church Lanier antedating the said Barrell grants, and if that entry was special within the meaning of that term in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Bienville Water Supply Co. v. MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Southern Iron & Coal Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Kellogg v. WoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. SawvelTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Allis v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Richardson v. SchwoonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API