King v. King
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 74, Jan. T., 1922, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Delaware Co., June T., 1919, No. 746, for plaintiff n. o. v., in case of Samuel J. King v. Edith King. Ejectment. Before Broomall, J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict for defendant, judgment n. o. y. for plaintiff: 15 Delaware Co. E. 509. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was judgment, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
In 1880 Samuel J. King, the plaintiff, became the owner of a house and large lot on Twenty-fourth Street in the City of Chester, which was the family homestead until the death of his wife in 1897. During the last-named year his son, Samuel J. King, Jr., married the defendant, Edith King, who sets up a parol gift to a part of the homestead property, including the dwelling house, alleged to have been made by plaintiff to herself and her husband, jointly, in 1898; followed by possession and improvements. Samuel J. King, Jr., died in 1919, and thereafter this ejectment was brought to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wright v. NultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Sorber v. MastersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
- Olinger v. ShultzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Reno v. MossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Derr v. AckermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Henes v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Kaufmann's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Yarnall EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Frazier v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Jordan v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.