Hallinan v. Hearst
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
On June 6, 1897, three members of the fire department of the city and county of San Francisco were killed in the discharge of their duties. The defendant Hearst, proprietor of the San Francisco Examiner, contributed money to relieve the necessities and to support the dependent families and relatives of the dead firemen, and made appeal, through the columns of his paper, to the public of San Francisco for like contributions. The result of his efforts was the collection, upon September 10,1897, of the sum of $5,940.25. He thereupon referred the question of the apportionment and disposition of…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of MarreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Estate of GreenleafCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Katz v. GreeningerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- McCarthy v. PoulsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.