White v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hines, Justice.
We consider whether an insurance company may exclude from uninsured motorist coverage a resident relative of the named insured who owns her own automobile. Certiorari was granted to review the opinion in Metropolitan Property &c. Ins. Co. v. White, 217 Ga. App. 108 (456 SE2d 511) (1995). The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
The issue to be resolved is whether under Doe v. Rampley, 256 Ga. 575 (351 SE2d 205) (1987), and OCGA § 33-7-11, an insurer may provide by contract that a resident relative of the named insured who owns her own motor vehicle is excluded from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. NeeseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Doe v. RampleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dawkins v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Wagner v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Staton v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Zilka v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Hazelwood v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.