Legal Opinion

Doe v. Rampley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1987No. 43674PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice.

We consider the validity of an exclusion contained in the uninsured motorist coverage of an automobile liability insurance policy. Certiorari was granted to review the opinion in Rampley v. Doe, 179 Ga. App. 475 (347 SE2d 255) (1986). The opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

The issue to be resolved is whether an insurer may exclude uninsured motorist coverage under circumstances where an insured is injured through the negligence of an uninsured motorist but at a time when the insured is occupying a motor vehicle furnished for his regular use and it is not a vehicle…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Woods v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Rampley v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Frank v. Horizon Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, in 90-1534 v. Earl D. Hampton, Jr., Earl D. Hampton, Sr. And Barbara Hampton, in 90-1523Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Wagner v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. White v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  5. Staton v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API