Legal Opinion

Elliott v. United States

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided August 26, 1959No. Civ. 222 LPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN PELT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon a motion by the United States, the defendant, to dismiss the complaint filed by R. B. Elliott, pursuant to Section 107(d) (7 U.S.C.A. § 1831(d) of the Soil Bank Act (7 U.S.C.A. § 1801 et seq.). Defendant’s motion is in two parts; that .the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of this court, and that the complaint fails to state facts upon which relief can be granted. As it is decisive to the matter before us, this Court shall consider only the first part of the motion pertaining to jurisdiction.

I.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Estep v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Barnett v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gross v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. United States v. Thomas J. Maxwell, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Wilson Dickson v. Mrs. C. O. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Glen H. Shay Et Ux. v. Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation State Committee for ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Westcott v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API