Legal Opinion

Weber v. Dillon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1898PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from the District Court of Blaine County; before J. C. Tarsney, District Judge. Action by John D Weber and others against John H. Dillon, county treasurer of Blaine county. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

The plaintiffs in error, numbering over 450, commenced an injunction suit in the district court of Blaine county, against John H. Dillon, the county treasurer, to enjoin the collection of a portion of the taxes levied for the year 1897. The record in this case comes to this court on a transcript; and, notwithstanding- the plaintiffs have caused to be included therein many papers and files other than those which constituted the judgment roll, they cannot be considered. (Fisher v. U. S., 1 Okl. 252, 31 Pac. 195; Kingman v. Pixley, this volume, p. 351, 54 Pac.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stiles, Treasurer v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. McKee v. EatonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Wallace v. BullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  4. Hudson v. Commiss'rs of Atchison CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Bardrick v. DillonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Territory Ex Rel. Johnston v. WoolseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Marth v. City of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Coody v. CoodySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API