Legal Opinion

Mudrock v. Washburn Crosby Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1932No. 29,167PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an award of compensation.

Petitioner’s husband, Nick Mudrock, was employed by employer-relator in a large mill as a trucker and loader. There was a group of modernly equipped buildings eight to eleven stories high. There were adjacent loading platforms and railroad tracks. The employe came to his death as a result of a heat stroke. The sole question is whether the accident arose out of the employment.

During a part of the day the employe was trucking flour with a hand truck carrying six sacks weighing 98 pounds each. The day was extremely hot.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Peoples Coal & Ice Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Rau v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Hansen v. Northwestern Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  5. Dunnigan v. Clinton Falls Nursery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ruud v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  2. Ueltschi v. Certified Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API