Legal Opinion

Matter of Welfare of CAW

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1998No. C0-98-96, C2-98-97PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Both these appeals, brought to this court on the same day and subsequently consolidated for review, are premised on the contention that the St. Louis County juvenile court ordered 21-day out-of-home correctional placements without adequate evidence or findings of fact. The appeals having merit, we reverse the disposition in each proceeding.

FACTS

In separate cases, by orders respectively on December 16 and December 17, 1997, different trial court judges transferred custody of C.AW. and L.R.M.B. for 21-day residential placements at an institution identified as Chisholm…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of L.K.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. MyersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re the Welfare of M.A.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Glenda Kay S. v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Egan v. M. S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of J.S.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  2. In Re the Welfare of D.D.N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In Re the Welfare of N.T.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Opinion No. (2007), Nebraska Attorney General Reports2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API