Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of M.A.C.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 15, 1990No. CX-89-2057PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This is an appeal from a disposition in a juvenile delinquency proceeding. Appellant M.A.C. contends the trial court violated Minn.Stat. § 260.185, subd. 4 by modifying its original disposition without giving appellant prior notice or holding a hearing. Appellant also claims the trial court abused its discretion by changing its original order based on factors unrelated to his rehabilitative needs and by failing to make sufficient findings to support the new disposition. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
On October 6, 1989, a teacher at Denfeld High School in Duluth, Minnesota,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- In Re the Welfare of L.K.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re the Welfare of L.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Matter of PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of CAWCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re Welfare of J.B.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- In Re the Welfare of J.S.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re the Welfare of N.T.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re the Welfare of M.A.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990