Hissam v. Rusch
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining a demurrer to his complaint.
The facts stated as constituting the cause of action are briefly as follows:
In July, 1925, plaintiff and defendant made an agreement to exchange properties, plaintiff to convey to defendant a flat building in the city of St. Paul and defendant to convey to plaintiff 400 acres of land and a city lot in the state of Wisconsin. Thereafter they agreed that the title to the Wisconsin land should be examined by an attorney named Andrews residing at Portage, Wisconsin. Andrews examined the titles and made his report on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Paynesville Land Co. v. GrabowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Payson v. EverettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- Herrick v. NewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Paine v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
- Trainer v. LammersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sheridan County v. HandNebraska Supreme Court · 1926