Legal Opinion

Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Price

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1917No. 1125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyce, J.

Suit was brought by appellant, Price, to recover of the Quanah, Acme & Pacific Railway Company the value of a horse, together with attorney’s fees for the prosecution of the suit, alleged to have been killed on the right of way of the defendant. This appeal is from a judgment of the county court of Cottle county for $125, the value of the horse, and $20 attorney’s fees.

The testimony tends to show that appellant let its right of way fence and a gate through the same get out of repair, and that plaintiff’s horse, with other animals, entered the right of way through the open gate, grazed down…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Orphan Asylum v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  2. International & Great Northern Railroad v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. International & Great Northern Railroad v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Texas Pacific Railway Company v. SprolesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. William C. Barry, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
  2. Rasco v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. TroutTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  4. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API