Legal Opinion
Dey v. Allen
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided September 21, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On bill, &c. On exceptions to master’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Y. C.
Eobert E. Allen, late of the county of Monmouth, being seized of certain land and premises there situate, mortgaged the same to the complainants) his wife joining in the mortgage and releasing her dower. Afterwards Allen conveyed the mortgaged premises to a third party, his wife likewise joining therein and releasing her dower. After divestiture of title judgments were recovered against Allen by Lynch & Livingston, Humphrey & Martin and D. P. Forst & Co., in the order named, although Humphrey & Martin issued execution and secured a levy prior to Lynch & Livingston. The premises…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Central-Penn, Bank v. N.J. FidelityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Swift Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HightstownNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Walton v. HillierNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941