Legal Opinion
Tower v. Crosby
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 11, 1925PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, J.:
The sole question upon this appeal is the sufficiency of the complaint. The action is for libel. The complaint alleges the publication of a letter containing the following language relating to the plaintiff:
“ In reply to your letter of inquiry relative to filling the local Chamber of Commerce Secretaryship, I sought information from one of the Board of Directors who was a member at the time of the election of the new Secretary and who still is a member of the Board.
*393“ When I asked him if an offer was made to the Penn Yan Secretary of $6,000 and later $7,500, his answer was no. Mr.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- O'Connell v. . Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Van Heusen v. . ArgenteauNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- King v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- King v. . Sun Printing and Publishing CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by14 opinions
- Electrolux Corp. v. Val-Worth, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Pridonoff v. BalokovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Construction Technology v. Lockformer Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Frawley Chemical Corp. v. A. P. Larson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.