Legal Opinion
United States v. Diallo
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 14, 1994No. 93-1950, 93-1951 and 93-2147PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETTINE, Senior District Judge.
Defendants Mohamed Souare, Aboubacar Diallo and Amadou Diarra were convicted under a two-count indictment for possession of heroin with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 (1988). Defendants Diarra and Dial-lo appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to suppress evidence recovered after their arrests. Defendant Souare also appeals, arguing that the district court erred in denying his motion for a separate trial. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Martinez MolinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MeadeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Levy-CorderoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. David P. BizierCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.