Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sikes v. Sikes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1990No. 8910DC758Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge LEWIS

dissenting in part and concurring in part.

I respectfully dissent. The trial court found that “the defendant has complied with the payments of [the interim Order]” and yet *618ordered defendant to pay “arrearages for the children in the care of the Plaintiff from March, 1987 through the date of the entry of this Order [March, 1989]” at the rate of “$100.00 per month per child.” The interim Order stated that defendant would pay the specified amount “until further Orders of this Court,” at which time there would be “a subsequent determination of an appropriate level of child support.”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Warner v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Ellenberger v. EllenbergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Ellenberger v. EllenbergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API