Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. Muldrick

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1901PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From Grant: Morton D. Clifford, Judge. Action by Elmer Pruitt, an infant, by W. G. Overholt, his guardian ad litem, against Jennie Muldrick, as executrix of the will of John Muldrick, deceased. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton

Elmer Pruitt, a minor, brought this action by W. G. Overholt, his guardian ad litem, against Jennie Muldrick, as executrix of the last will and testament of John Muldrick, deceased. The complaint sets up the minority of Pruitt, the appointment of Overholt as guardian ad litem, his qualification, the decease of Muldrick, the probate of his will, the issuance of letters testamentary to defendant, the presentment of the claim sued on, her disallow- . anee thereof, and the manner 'in which the indebtedness arose, etc. The defendant denied that John Muldrick ever became indebted to plaintiff in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Taylor v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Wilkes v. CorneliusOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Wilkes v. CorneliusOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Harding v. GrimOregon Supreme Court · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Stout's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Morgan's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Branch v. McCormick's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Stillwell v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Crow v. AbrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1917

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API