Legal Opinion · Dissent

Albers v. Koffman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 17, 1991No. WD 44681Published

1DissentLowenstein, Chief Judge

I respectfully file this dissent.

I believe the categorization of jailing here as “civil” matter as opposed to a “criminal” matter creates a legal distinction without a difference that is oft times as difficult to justify as the debates between what are “governmental” and “proprietary” functions. No matter the legal denomination used to describe the events here, the indigent person will be behind bars without the benefit of a lawyer.

Section 600.042.3(4) requires the public defender to provide legal services to anyone “whom the federal constitution ... requires appointment of counsel.”

In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Sullivan v. DaltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API