Legal Opinion

Trush v. Shields

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 25, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor :

The petition for leave to intervene should be denied. Ehrenstrom v. Phillips, 9 Del. Ch. 74, 77 A. 80, is decisive upon the question. The fact that a vendee of land who acquired title with notice of a prior outstanding contract of purchase in another will be required specifically to perform the latter’s contract, as was held in Long v. Chandler, et al., 11 Del. Ch. 125, 98 A. 189, has no bearing upon the question which Ehrenstrom v. Phillips, supra, decides. That case, I may say, recognizes the propriety of the complainant’s joining the rival purchaser as a party defendant. ■…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ehrenstrom v. PhillipsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1910
  2. Long v. ChandlerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stabel v. GertelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Larsen v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API