Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Fall River Ironworks

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 10, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit for demurrage.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, District Judge.

These are two suits, brought by the firm of' Charles M. Taylor’s Sons against the Fall River Ironworks, to recover demurrage for delay in unloading two cargoes of coal shipped from Cardiff to New York on the steamers North Point and Montauk Point. • In the early part of October, 1902, the Fall River Ironworks purchased by cable from Mann, George & Co., of London, 11,000 tons of Welsh coal. The contract provided that the coal should be delivered free alongside at New York. The Fall River Ironworks, therefore, under its contract with Mann, George & Co., was under no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jennings v. Grand Trunk RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Neilsen v. JesupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1887
  3. Egan v. Barclay Fibre Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Union Pac. R. v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. Yone Suzuki v. Central Argentine Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
  3. Yone Suzuki & Co. v. Central Argentine Ry. Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1927
  4. Frontier S. S. Co. v. Central Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
  5. Milos Product Tanker Corporation v. Valero Marketing and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API