Legal Opinion
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. ex rel. Migura v. City of Fort Worth
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 7, 1975No. 17629PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON APPEALABILITY OF JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
Plaintiff’s auto was damaged when struck by two different vehicles in the same accident; he brings suit against the driver and owner of each vehicle (four different people: A-1, A-2, B-1 and B-2). Service is attempted as to all four, but none is ever made as to the drivers A-1 and B-1, substituted or otherwise. Only reference in transcript other than the pleadings as to drivers is a release signed by plaintiff as to driver A-1. Plaintiff then dismissed case as to owner A-2 and pursues case only as against owner B-2. B-2’s “Plea to Jurisdiction” is sustained and…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Davis v. McCray Refrigerator Sales Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Moody v. SmootTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Hoover v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Gumpp v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Stoner v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. Ex Rel. Migura v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Twin Creeks Golf Group, L.P. v. Sunset Ridge Owners Association, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015