Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Reid v. Reid

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 27, 1991No. 1484-89-2Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBenton, J.

I concur in Parts I and II of the opinion, but I dissent from Part III because I disagree with the majority opinion’s view that the law forecloses Robert Reid (the payor spouse) from seeking restitution of money paid to his former wife as spousal support.1 *1235Whenever a decision of this Court sets aside an initial spousal support award that has not been stayed by the trial judge, I believe the trial judge, upon a proper request, must exercise discretion to determine on a case-by-case basis whether restitution is warranted.

It has long been the rule in Virginia that if, pending an appeal, the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Shiflet v. EllerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  2. Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kennedy Coal Corp. v. Buckhorn Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  4. Rhodes v. SiglerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Ure v. UreIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API