Smolenski v. Libby, McNeill & Libby
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
Plaintiff claimed that on December 27, 1934, she bought from a market in Detroit a can of plum pudding, which was prepared, canned and marketed by defendant; that in accordance with the printed label upon the can, she boiled the closed can for an hour; that then she attempted to open it and after giving one twist on the top of the can with the key attached to its side, the contents of the can exploded in her face and covered the kitchen walls and ceiling; that she was severely injured; that the particles of plum pudding were embedded in her flesh and remained there for a few days before they…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hertzler v. ManshumMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Cheli v. Cudahy Bros. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Jackson Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. ChapmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1914
- O'Neill v. JamesMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Glaser v. SeitzNew York Supreme Court · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
- MacRes v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Ebers v. General Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Kenower v. Hotels Statler Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- MacRes v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.