Legal Opinion

Yungwirth v. McAvoy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1972No. 72-193PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants maintain that the jury’s verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence, and seek a new trial.

As succinctly stated by the late Justice Zimmerman: “This court does not weigh evidence.” Schofield v. Cleveland Trust Co. (1948), 149 Ohio St. 133, 139.

Even assuming that we were to weigh the evidence, examination of the record reveals substantial support for the jury’s verdict. As most recently stated by this court-in Rohde v. Farmer (1970), 23 Ohio St. 2d 82, the question of whether to grant a new trial upon the basis of the weight of the evidence is within the sound discretion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Eric McNello v. John B. Kelly, Inc. v. B. J. Lucarelli and Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  3. Schofield v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Reichert v. IngersollOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Jenkins v. KriegerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API