Unicorn Field, Inc. v. Cannon Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*220OPINION
BAUMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved for an order pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure designating this a class action. Defendants do not contest the propriety of some form of class action treatment; the controversy before the court concerns rather the manner in which the class should be defined, the notice it should be provided, and certain-jurisdictional questions the significance of which is largely academic.
The Cannon Group (“Cannon”), a New York corporation engaged, directly and through subsidiaries, in the production and distribution of feature length…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Joseph Peters v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Gross v. Diversified Mortgage InvestorsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Zola v. GordonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- McFarland v. Memorex Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1980
- In Re AES Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.