Legal Opinion

Matter of McBratney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 8, 1996No. 24362PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, the Hearing Panel recommended that respondent be privately reprimanded for misconduct in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR, and Rules on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR. The Executive Committee accepted the Panel’s findings of facts and conclusions of law, but voted to recommend that respondent be publicly reprimanded. We find the appropriate sanction is a definite suspension from the practice of law for a period of ninety (90) days.

The ethical violations committed by respondent arise from his involvement in a romantic…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re KennedySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. In the Matter of SolomonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. In Re HeardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re ParrottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API