Legal Opinion
Moody v. Hicks
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 1997No. 70982PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRIMM, Presiding Judge.
Defendants, St. Louis police officers, executed a search warrant for drugs and related items at plaintiff’s apartment. Nothing was found. Plaintiff then sued the officers for trespass and other torts. During discovery, plaintiff sought the identity of the confidential informant who furnished the information for the search warrant. The trial court denied the request. The jury’s verdicts were for defendants.
On appeal, plaintiff raises six points. She alleges the trial court erred in (1) denying her motion to disclose the confidential informant, (2) directing a verdict on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hampton v. HanrahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- People v. DardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Twiehaus v. AdolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Brown v. HamidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Christopher J. Godfrey v. State of Iowa Terry Branstad, Governor of the State of Iowa, Individually and in His Official Capacity Kimberly Reynolds, Lieutenant Governor of the State of Iowa, Individually and in Her Official Capacity Jeffrey Boeyink, Chief of Staff to the Governor of the State of Iowa, Individually and in His Official Capacity Brenna Findley, Legal Counsel to the Governor of TheSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
- Cantrell v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Collins-Camden Partnership v. County of JeffersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.