Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Adams

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1927No. 27,109; No. 27,213; No. 27,217; No. 27,230PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

These were actions to recover from the officers and directors of a defunct bank the amounts of several deposits, under-*677the statute which provides, among other things, that any officer or director of a bank who receives or assents to the reception of deposits by it when he knows it is insolvent or in a failing condition is liable therefor. (R. 'S. 9-163, 9-164.) The question of the constitutionality of this statute was considered in some of the same cases on a previous hearing. (Ramsey Petroleum Company v. Adams, 119 Kan. 844, 241 Pac. 433.)

T…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Schlesinger v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Yates v. Jones National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Bowerman v. HamnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ferry v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Paris v. BecknerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Pirott v. HeinenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Marshall v. BethkaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  5. Ferry v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API