Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Bethka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1931No. 29,907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action to recover on the statutory liability of .bank directors who knowingly assent to the reception of deposits by their bank at a time when it is insolvent or in failing circumstances.

In 1921 the Cedar State Bank, in Smith county, got into financial difficulties, and the bank commissioner ordered it closed unless new capital was put into it. Some effort was made to satisfy his orders; a change was made in the cashier’s office and three bankers of *82neighboring towns, Hull of Kirwin, Bethka of Stuttgart, and Cushing of Downs,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ferry v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. American State Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Fourth National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Quinton v. KendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Forbes v. MohrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sipes v. PessemierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API