Legal Opinion
Tardanico v. Murphy
District Court, D. Puerto Rico
Decided September 30, 1997No. CIV. 94-1529(DRD)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DOMINGUEZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this contract action, claiming the annulment of the contract due to Defendants’ deceit. In the alternative, Plaintiffs request the contract’s resolution due to Defendants, breach, as well as a damages award. Defendants denied Plaintiffs’ claims and counterclaimed for expenses incurred after Plaintiffs abandoned the property object of this case.
Pending before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment requesting (1) the dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims and (2) judgment in Defendants’ favor as to the counterclaim. (Docket No.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steven Wynne v. Tufts University School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1398, 35 fed.r.serv.3d 395 Miguel Angel Ayala-Gerena v. Bristol Myers-Squibb Company, D/B/A Bristol Myers-SquibbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kelly v. MarxMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- MMG PRCI CFL, LLC. v. BMF, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024