Legal Opinion

Jimeno v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 31, 1939No. C. D. 87PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CliNe, Judge:

In these suits against the United States the plaintiffs seek to recover a part of the duty paid on several shipments of honeydew melons imported at the port of New York, the claim being that the collector should have made an allowance in liquidation or reliquidation under the provisions of section 506 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for the melons condemned by the Department of Health.

When the cases were called for trial these three protests were consolidated for hearing and counsel for the plaintiffs offered in evidence all the papers sent to the court by the collector of customs,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. States v. StrausCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. MurphyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. United States v. Tower & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. Bertrose Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cummins-Collins Distilleries v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API