Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Pacher

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 17, 1964No. 3956; No. R-917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrooks, P. J.

This is an action of tort for personal injuries and property damage. The answer is general denial and contributory negligence.

Evidence most favorable to plaintiff tended to show the following: Plaintiff Mitchell was operator of a taxicab owned by plaintiff *33Michael’s Cab, Inc. This cab was transporting passengers from downtown Boston to the Park Square entrance of Hotel Statler in Boston.

Close by this same entrance was a taxicab operated by defendant Pacher an employee of defendant Town Taxi, acting within the scope of his authority. The Town Taxi had been double parked for about 30 seconds in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Dillon v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Barsky v. HansenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. North Anson Lumber Co. v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Proulx v. St. Anne's Credit Union of Fall RiverMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981
  2. Salamon v. TerraMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API