Legal Opinion

Beyette v. City of Watertown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Following a determination by the State Comptroller that petitioner is entitled to benefits for a disability incurred in the performance of duty (Retirement and Social Security Law § 363-c), petitioner applied to respondents for differential disability benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-a (2). Respondents denied the application. Supreme Court annulled the determination denying the application and respondents appeal.

Supreme Court properly annulled respondents’ determination. A municipality is bound by the Comptroller’s finding…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Putnam v. City of WatertownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Ireland v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Dembowski v. La PollaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Driscoll v. Department of Fire of City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API