Legal Opinion

Ekman v. Mountain Motors, Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1961No. 3005PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Blume

In this case the plaintiff, Mountain Motors, Inc., brought an action against Lee Ekman, defendant, alleging that on May 29, 1959, plaintiff sold and delivered to defendant a 1959 Simca (French made) automobile for $2,589.08 upon which there was an agreed balance due plaintiff from the defendant of $1,971.36, the transaction being pursuant to the terms of a conditional sale contract executed by plaintiff and defendant; that thereafter defendant failed to make payments in accordance with the terms of the conditional sale contract; that plaintiff elected to declare the unpaid balance immediately…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. E. B. Waples & Co. v. H. C. Overaker & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Studebaker Bros. v. MauWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lewis v. . GreiderNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Studebaker Bros. v. MauWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Chapman v. IngramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vic Hansen & Sons, Inc. v. CrowleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. American State Bank of Killdeer v. HewsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Peoples Acceptance Corp. v. Van EppsOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Chapple v. GangerDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1994
  5. Harding v. United States Figure Skating Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API