People v. Walstatter
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Although the testimony of the complainant and defendant was in sharp conflict on the issue of forcible compulsion, it cannot be said as a matter of law that the evidence, *873viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution, was legally insufficient. Nor did the court abuse its discretion in refusing to allow defendant to use live models for an in-court demonstration. Those of defendant’s remaining contentions that are preserved for review have been considered and do not warrant reversal.
Chief Judge Cooke and…
2Cited by8 opinions
- People v. GonzalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. PorrataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. RosemondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. GleixnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. BowenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.