Legal Opinion

Danner v. Atkins

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1956No. L. A. 24176PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment of the court, sitting without a jury, in their action to recover for personal injuries and property damages sustained when a truck, allegedly as the result of negligence of the driver, defendant Atkins, rolled into a café plaintiffs operated. We have concluded that plaintiffs’ contention that by reason of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine negligence of the driver was established as a matter of law, is without merit, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

From the record it appears that at about 8 :30 on an evening in October, 1952, a truck being…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Newing v. CheathamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Joseph M. Trihey, Administrator of the Estate of Maria G. Muna, Deceased v. Transocean Air Lines, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Bessie Gerhardt v. Fresno Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Rayner v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Tangora v. MatankyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API