Legal Opinion

Morman v. Harrington

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Kent; Grove, J. Assumpsit by Samuel A. Morman against Eli E. Harrington on a contract of guaranty. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

On March 10,1893, the parties hereto entered into a land contract, by which the defendant became the purchaser from plaintiff of 40 acres of land in Kent county for the price of #7,000. Defendant paid thereon at the date of the contract $4,950 in cash or its equivalent, and turned over to plaintiff at the same time $2,400 of the preferred stock of the Gypsum Plaster & Stucco Company, at a valuation of $2,000; giving at the same time a written agreement to pay the plaintiff $2,000 for the stock whenever it should be rendered worthless by the insolvency of the company. This left only $50 of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Warren v. ColeMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Lenox v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Stone v. CovellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Jackson v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Ganong v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Nowicki v. PodgorskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Brown v. South Joplin Lead & Zinc Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. Reger v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Wegner v. HerkimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API