Texas Carpenters Health Benefit Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HEARTFIELD, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [19]. The Court heard argument on the motion May 6, 1998. Having considered the arguments of counsel, the papers submitted, the applicable law and the record in this case, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED.
I. Background
Plaintiffs are three union trust funds 1 (Funds) which provide comprehensive health care benefits to employees, retirees and then-dependents (Participants) through welfare benefit plans. Compl, ¶ 1. The Funds are governed by the Employment…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- In re Aqua Dots Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Iron Workers Local Union No.17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.