Legal Opinion
Catlin Syndicate Ltd. v. Imperial Palace of Mississippi, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 16, 2010No. 09-60209PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRADO, Circuit Judge:
Insurer Catlin Syndicate and casino operator Imperial Palace disagree about how to determine loss under the business-interruption provision of the insurance policy that Catlin issued to Imperial Palace. Catlin argues that the business-interruption provision unambiguously indicates that only historical sales figures should be considered when determining loss. Imperial Palace argues that the provision is ambiguous, and therefore sales figures after reopening should also be taken into account. 1
We addressed the definition of “loss” under a materially identical…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Puckett v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Gonzalez v. DenningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. of Mississippi v. MartinMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Ideal Mutual Insurance Co. v. Last Days Evangelical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Finger Furniture Company Inc., Plaintiff-Counter v. Commonwealth Insurance Company, Defendant-Counter Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alvaro Albanil v. Coast 2 Coast, Inc., Et ACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Lexington InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Barden Mississippi Gaming Limited Liability Corp. v. Great Northern InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Gum Tree Property Management, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Federal Insurance Company v. Tungsten Heavy Powder & Parts, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023