Legal Opinion

State v. Alphonse

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 18, 1975No. 75-160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument and after review of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that the state has failed to demonstrate reversible error; the trial court properly granted defendants’ motions to suppress the contents of intercepted wire communications and defendants’ motion to suppress evidence secured by a search warrant predicated upon the fruits of such intercepted communications. In particular, the original affidavit for the wire tap order did not reflect the presence of sufficient probable cause within the requirements of Rodriguez v. State, Fla.1974,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. Hamelmann v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Singleton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API